From 3adc586d9d7539e4d33f737110ffd4e236379099 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John MacFarlane Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2015 12:41:47 -0700 Subject: Added benchmark for hoedown. Note that hoedown doesn't show the 32/64 bit difference that sundown does -- so it was probably a bug in sundown. Removed the comments from benchmarks.md about this. --- benchmarks.md | 13 +++---------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) (limited to 'benchmarks.md') diff --git a/benchmarks.md b/benchmarks.md index 848c54a..e905119 100644 --- a/benchmarks.md +++ b/benchmarks.md @@ -14,9 +14,9 @@ Some benchmarks, run on an ancient Thinkpad running Intel Core 2 Duo at 2GHz. | marked | 1.94 | | **commonmark.js** | 1.93 | | discount | 1.86 | -| sundown | 0.33 | -| **cmark** | 0.33 | - +| **cmark** | 0.35 | +| sundown | 0.34 | +| hoedown | 0.21 | To run these benchmarks, use `make bench PROG=/path/to/program`. @@ -31,10 +31,3 @@ with the benchmark input and the time to run it with no input. not penalized by startup time.) A median of ten runs is taken. The process is reniced to a high priority so that the system doesn't interrupt runs. - -Note that these benchmarks were done on a 32-bit machine. On a 64-bit -machines, sundown is significantly faster than cmark (0.146s vs 0.237s -on Intel i5/OSX with Clang, 0.130s vs 0.191s on a 64-bit Debian VPS -with GCC). I do not know why the performance difference shows up on -the 64-bit architecture and not the 32-bit, but that is something that -might be investigated. -- cgit v1.2.3